sexual superstitions?

When we don't like the person it is an OUTING.
When we like the person, it seems further enrichment and detail of the person's character?

As Bobby says, why do 'they' wanna know? they wanna have sex with the person? merlin has been on the net since the early 1990's, first on CU-SeeMe. it is interesting, having chatted with people all over the world to notice that the only country where the first question out of the mouth's of chatters is about the other person's sexual orientation. and quess which country that is? yup the US of A. no one in europe seems to ever care what someone elses' sexuality is on line, while chatting on a non-sex sight that is, yet americans will demand to know immediately and stop chatting when they feel the other person is not straight. at least that was true in the 1990'sish.

and yeah, AC is hot, sweet, sensitive and a great spokes model. so what does that get the rest of us?

in love,

merlin

Well, the point, in some quarters at least, is that he's not such a great spokesmodel if he is so evasive about his sexuality. Except maybe a metrosexual spokesmodel.

And yes, I always also thought that it was odd that beginning in the 1990's, the first words out of the mouth of a customer at the door of a club were, "Is this a gay club?" Before then, those first words were, "Is it fun?"

So who's going to answer the question?

About why the emphasis on a person's sexual orientation as a primary qualifier?

They want to have sex with them? -I think that was Merlin quoting Bobby, if I remember the posts from above.

Is that a learned behavior, wanting to know someone else's 'sexual orientation', is it another category of conformity? People in Europe aren't preoccupied with it(like how people as Hatches says used to just ask if the club was fun)because they all fuck everybody all over the place all the time and everybody knows all about it -and yes that is a wild generalization but just as a way to characterize the whole different social orientation-! It is not a cultural difference because culturally people don't practice sex in any markedly different way as far as the acts themselves are concerned, I mean sex there isn't, like, driving your car in to somebody.

Personally, having myself defined by others as a matter of habit, by who I fuck and what kinds of things I do with who I fuck that are in part biologically determined because of their gender, is such a rountine of subordinations I find it a repellant false aggression whenever it arises, anywhere, anytime. So I generally comport myself in a way to dampen and delimit such efforts just as such stigmatizing seeks to dampen and delimit what I am as a living person.

But I think to have being gay radically reduced to a term that initiates conflict is of course a form of violence.

Sexual superstitions.

Since a turning point in the 1960's,observing the following slight transformations in the social need to inspect and quantify the sexuality of every citizen, it can be really fucking hard to have patience. (shrugs)

Think of how being a metrosexual kind of has the status being an independent in a two party democracy has. In this society a person's identity has a market value and political implications before anything else. How better to irrevocably program this than to base that market value and those political implications right on one's very preferences for biological gratification?

The sexual acts that provide the greatest level of gratification you can possibly experience are what determine how you participate in pre-scheduled mass emotions. In the end there is no morality to this at all besides that of a phoney juridical public inspection.

I don't know what good it does us, collectively, whether the news personality is gay. And just wanting to know, well, that's a whole other topic let's not get started on. Just safe to say knowing if someone is gay isn't going to provide anyone with the undisturbed bliss of being back in the womb.

Sorry to drag on for so long. I'm heading over to peep at what Anna Nicole posted in "Real Sex Stories" now.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: seven,

had to post this from Gawker. Screen grab from last night's 360:

Anderson Cooper Has No Idea Why People Are Convinced He’s Gay

coop

sexuality is the new racism? keith ledger seems to agree on that one.

sexual superstition is very old. look at what lott's neighbors said to him 3000 years ago. (no really look at the story, it's amazingly contemporary) lots neighbors said, 'either your friends have sex with us the way GOD intended people to have sex, or YOU and YOUR GUESTS will be rounded up and sacreficed in defense of GOD and our religion.' what's the difference today? where has religion gone with this message from lott's time? is the only message of this story to watch which neighborhood you move into?

supporting this superstitious sexuality is an elaborate series of personal aggreements among people. like with slavery, everyone has to aggree on what is superstitious sexuality, everyone has to work together to punish others for not conforming. and social as well as the religious threats of future punishment by god are loud and clear to further support racism/slavery/homophobia. yes, all three use the same social mechinism to spread the hate and intentional misunderstanding.

as we read some posts on chat rooms and in adds at the 'back' of one of our favorite magazines. racism in sexuality is still very strong. am sure it isn't learned so much as part of the inner human struggle to have genetic survival. merlin is sure that our genes dictate more than the color of our skin, it may attribute to sexual regionalism and racism.

and yes, there is no such thing as gay sex. there is only sex. those that make the distinction are doing so for political reasons. supersition in sexuality also creates the lack of information about sexuality in america, so who can make a good decision about sex when the government lies about sexuality and sexual transmitted deseases. the government is editing out and refuses to allow the word homosexaul on government websites etc.

it would not be so hard sometimes, if some superstitious people were not working so hard to make laws that suit their under research claims about sexuality.

in love,

merlin

Merls:
I almost hate to ask but who is Keith Ledger?

who is merls?

I couldn't imagine anyone gayer than Tucker Carlson. Even if he is straight, he acts gayer than any man exclusively attracted to other men.
The only thing that might out him as straight is his hopeless lack of style (that horrid bowtie). It's no trademark - it's just ugly.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: 6,

I'm with you.
He is gayer than gay.
It's just that stupid bowtie that says, "Only a straight man would think that this bowtie is a fashion statement".

And you'll notice that he is hiding his crotch in a classic "gay shame" sort of way.

Ew. We don't want HIM on our team. Straight straight straight, we hope. And while we're at it, let's drop Anderson Cooper. He's really beginning to booore me too. Let's close this topic. I think they are already enough gays!

I agree Honey.

Way too many fruits in the bowl if ya catch my drift.

Well I don't know. I think some of the kids do it right.

Hey!
Where did you get my baby picture?!

Messy Bonnie Raitt's wallet. She says she gave this kid away as a raffle prize at this used to be club, Jackie 60. She said Ru Paul won but offed the tot on someone named, uh, I think, Strawberry.

Thank you for Clearing this up for me! I thought AC was a devout homosexualist, and I always wondered, and of course nobody really knows for sure, because of those wankers at CNN and I too hate CNN, FOX News, MSNBC, all of which are NOT where the news is. OF COURSE they want to keep mum about it they HATE devout homosexualists in that area of "news reporting." Espcially Bill O'REALLY? NUFF SAID (sorry for using caps.) That AC is some guy, huh? "All man." Huh,as in top or bottom? HEHE. Sorry for being facetious. But seriously what's a nice sensitive guy like AC doing at CNN? Oh, yeah, the money! Man I could make him my sugar daddy! LOL!

And If Tucker Carlson is gay who would wanna get it on with him. Well, I'd put a bag over his head first (both the big head and the little one!).

This message has been edited. Last edited by: daddy,

I'd love to see a secret (Paris Hilton type) sex video with Tucker Carlson and Ann Coulter.
I'm sure he could never get it up with her though. She would scare him to death.
Scare ANYONE to death!



Damn!
I knew I wouldn't get away with this.

The Empress made me edit Ann Coulter's open muff.
She said that she was going to throw up.

OK, here is the G-Rated version.
So much for free speech!

This message has been edited. Last edited by: daddy,

OMG.
(Thank goddess for Chi Chi!)
S

Maybe Empress decided on the side of dry?

This message has been edited. Last edited by: seven,